翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ People's Commissariat for Communications of the USSR ・ People That Can Eat People Are the Luckiest People in the World ・ People That I Meet ・ People to Each Other ・ People to People ・ People to People International ・ People to People Student Ambassador Program ・ People Today (magazine) ・ People Tree Ltd. ・ People TV ・ People TV (Atlanta) ・ People Under the Stairs ・ People Under The Stairs discography ・ People United Means Action ・ People v. Aaron ・ People v. Aguilar ・ People v. Anderson ・ People v. Beardsley ・ People v. Berry ・ People v. Bray ・ People v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co. ・ People v. Clayton ・ People v. Collins ・ People v. Croswell ・ People v. Diaz ・ People v. Drew ・ People v. Freeman ・ People v. Gissendanner ・ People v. Goetz ・ People v. Hall Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク People v. Aguilar ： ウィキペディア英語版 People v. Aguilar ''People v. Aguilar'', 2 N.E.3d 321 (Ill. 2013), was an Illinois Supreme Court case in which the Court held that on its face, the Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon (AUUF) statute violated the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment. The Court stated that this was because the statute amounted to a wholesale statutory ban on the exercise of a personal right that was specifically named in and guaranteed by the United States Constitution, as construed by the United States Supreme Court. A conviction for Unlawful Possession of a Firearm (UPF) was proper because the possession of handguns by minors was conduct that fell outside the scope of the Second Amendment's protection. In 2008, Alberto Aguilar, then 17, was arrested and charged with AUUF and UPF. After being convicted and sentenced to probation by the trial court, he appealed, arguing that both statutes were unconstitutional infringements of his Second Amendment rights. The Illinois Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction, and he appealed that ruling to the Illinois Supreme Court. While Aguilar's appeal was pending, the Federal Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that the AUUF statute was unconstitutional. When the matter was decided by the Illinois Supreme Court, they agreed with the Seventh Circuit and declared the AUUF law unconstitutional, but upheld the constitutionality of the UPF law. == Background == 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「People v. Aguilar」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.